[资料]关于模型遥控器辐射对健康的影响

emptjf

制式不同 手机频率也不同
对讲机 （u段）400-480mhz吧 大概 我既不清了
GSM手机使用的是900/1800 mHz，
CDMA手机使用的是800/1900 mHz,
3G手机则可以使用800/900/1800/1900 mHz,
小型的wifi传播距离一般为为100-500米，使用的频段为2400 MHz-5800 mHz。
2.4G=2400mhz
嗯 这里就是给大家一个参考 2.4G的频率 2.4G遥控器和我们的手机频率是差不多的



下面就是英文了 咱转行学医 数据来自pubmed 至于这个数据库的地位 权威性 真实性 影响力我不多说 多少都认识几个医生护士把？去问他们

外国核心数据库收录的研究数据 信不信呢？你们看着办



electromagnetic radiation---关键词 电磁辐射

这个是手机电磁辐射对于体外精细胞活性的研究
Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic  waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: an in vitro pilot study

Objective
To evaluate effects of cellular phone radiofrequency  electromagnetic  waves (RF-EMW) during talk mode on unprocessed (neat) ejaculated human semen.

Result(s)
Samples exposed to RF-EMW showed a significant decrease in sperm motility and viability, increase in ROS level, and decrease in ROS-TAC score. Levels of TAC and DNA damage showed no significant differences from the unexposed group.
Conclusion(s)
Radiofrequency  electromagnetic  waves emitted from cell phones may lead to oxidative stress in human semen. We speculate that keeping the cell phone in a trouser pocket in talk mode may negatively affect spermatozoa and impair male fertility.
结论 放在裤子口袋里 有害
2


同样 也是对精子的研究
Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation  from a Cellular Phone on Human Sperm Motility: An In Vitro Study
Background
There has been growing public concern on the effects of  electromagnetic radiation  (EMR) emitted by cellular phones on human health. Many studies have recently been published on this topic. However, possible consequences of the cellular phone usage on human sperm parameters have not been investigated adequately.
Methods
A total number of 27 males were enrolled in the study. The semen sample obtained from each participant was divided equally into two parts. One of the specimens was exposed to EMR emitted by an activated 900 MHz cellular phone, whereas the other was not. The concentration and motility of the specimens were compared to analyze the effects of EMR. Assessment of sperm movement in all specimens was performed using four criteria: (A) rapid progressive, (B) slow progressive, (C) nonprogressive, (D) no motility.
Results
Statistically significant changes were observed in the rapid progressive, slow progressive and no-motility categories of sperm movement. EMR exposure caused a subtle decrease in the rapid progressive and slow progressive sperm movement. It also caused an increase in the no-motility category of sperm movement. There was no statistically significant difference in the sperm concentration between two groups.
Conclusions
These data suggest that EMR emitted by cellular phone influences human sperm motility. In addition to these acute adverse effects of EMR on sperm motility, long-term EMR exposure may lead to behavioral or structural changes of the male germ cell. These effects may be observed later in life, and they are to be investigated more seriously.
结论 长期暴露有害
3
Electromagnetic  fields and DNA damage

Abstract
A major concern of the adverse effects of exposure to non-ionizing  electromagnetic  field (EMF) is cancer induction. Since the majority of cancers are initiated by damage to a cell's genome, studies have been carried out to investigate the effects of  electromagnetic fields on DNA and chromosomal structure. Additionally, DNA damage can lead to changes in cellular functions and cell death. Single cell gel electrophoresis, also known as the ‘comet assay’, has been widely used in EMF research to determine DNA damage, reflected as single-strand breaks, double-strand breaks, and crosslinks. Studies have also been carried out to investigate chromosomal conformational changes and micronucleus formation in cells after exposure to EMF. This review describes the comet assay and its utility to qualitatively and quantitatively assess DNA damage, reviews studies that have investigated DNA strand breaks and other changes in DNA structure, and then discusses important lessons learned from our work in this area.
这个结论没找到 手头方便的同志们可以在数据库里自己找
下面这个是关于手机的 对于无线电激活氧化物质对DNA的伤害研究
Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro.
De Iuliis GN, Newey RJ, King BV, Aitken RJ.
ARC Centre of Excellence in Biotechnology and Development, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In recent times there has been some controversy over the impact of electromagnetic radiation on human health. The significance of mobile phone radiation on male reproduction is a key element of this debate since several studies have suggested a relationship between mobile phone use and semen quality. The potential mechanisms involved have not been established, however, human spermatozoa are known to be particularly vulnerable to oxidative stress by virtue of the abundant availability of substrates for free radical attack and the lack of cytoplasmic space to accommodate antioxidant enzymes. Moreover, the induction of oxidative stress in these cells not only perturbs their capacity for fertilization but also contributes to sperm DNA damage. The latter has, in turn, been linked with poor fertility, an increased incidence of miscarriage and morbidity in the offspring, including childhood cancer. In light of these associations, we have analyzed the influence of RF-EMR on the cell biology of human spermatozoa in vitro. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Purified human spermatozoa were exposed to radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) tuned to 1.8 GHz and covering a range of specific absorption rates (SAR) from 0.4 W/kg to 27.5 W/kg. In step with increasing SAR, motility and vitality were significantly reduced after RF-EMR exposure, while the mitochondrial generation of reactive oxygen species and DNA fragmentation were significantly elevated (P<0.001). Furthermore, we also observed highly significant relationships between SAR, the oxidative DNA damage bio-marker, 8-OH-dG, and DNA fragmentation after RF-EMR exposure. CONCLUSIONS: RF-EMR in both the power density and frequency range of mobile phones enhances mitochondrial reactive oxygen species generation by human spermatozoa, decreasing the motility and vitality of these cells while stimulating DNA base adduct formation and, ultimately DNA fragmentation. These findings have clear implications for the safety of extensive mobile phone use by males of reproductive age, potentially affecting both their fertility and the health and wellbeing of their offspring.

感到不安了？

没事 这一篇文章很适合害怕的人们

Extremely low frequency electric fields and cancer: assessing the evidence.
Kheifets L, Renew D, Sias G, Swanson J.
Department of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health, University of California-Los Angeles, 650 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA. kheifets@ucla.edu
Comment in:
•
Bioelectromagnetics. 2010 Feb;31(2):102-3.
Abstract
Much of the research and reviews on extremely low frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields (EMFs) have focused on magnetic rather than electric fields. Some have considered such focus to be inappropriate and have argued that electric fields should be part of both epidemiologic and laboratory work. This paper fills the gap by systematically and critically reviewing electric-fields literature and by comparing overall strength of evidence for electric versus magnetic fields. The review of possible mechanisms does not provide any specific basis for focusing on electric fields. While laboratory studies of electric fields are few, they do not indicate that electric fields should be the exposure of interest. The existing epidemiology on residential electric-field exposures and appliance use does not support the conclusion of adverse health effects from electric-field exposure. Workers in close proximity to high-voltage transmission lines or substation equipment can be exposed to high electric fields. While there are sporadic reports of increase in cancer in some occupational studies, these are inconsistent and fraught with methodologic problems. Overall, there seems little basis to suppose there might be a risk for electric fields, and, in contrast to magnetic fields, and with a possible exception of occupational epidemiology, there seems little basis for continued research into electric fields. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.


变电站的英文是：substaion 我昨晚整理了一晚上数据 麻痹的毕业设计真JB恶心，实在是没精神 有兴趣的自己搜吧 相信有惊喜的，我最后要说的是 ，不要轻易的相信什么。不管是是谁说的，明白我的意思了么？ 多思考多学习。反正现在网络很方便。



当然 有人想实际评估的话也不难  我们就来个经典的case-control分析吧  （不知道case-control？简单说就是一组小白鼠吃A药 一种不吃）

相信无线电无害的朋友们 请把你们的控打开 用天线头（拉开的）或者2.4G的头子指向你的脑门

有人说谁那么神经病天天那个控  没关系
睡觉的时候打开就可以 放在床头
哦 有2.4G  1w图传的，不信邪的FPV朋友们也可以试试看 这个效果更好
对照组你们该干啥干啥去 无所谓
一年后 MRI片子见分晓 反正头部MRI片子诊断 你看书就能看懂了。

最后重申一下 控的辐射虽然有害 但是为了这点短时间低剂量暴露条件下风险还不至于造成暴露的危害，也就是用说风险评估的观点理论来看 ，可以正常使用。

duan123

继续水，哈哈，拿积分，顺便帮顶，不谢

Marshal

要是谁能帮忙翻译一下就更好了

Marshal

总之合理使用，不过度使用